A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a situation that has captivated national focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental problems, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised authorized struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to make their household home. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, the place progress pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of recognized citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically in a very delicate coastal atmosphere such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach of their scheduling permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the proper placement. Their lawful crew has characterised the motion being an try and delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, the place views of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture which has because become emblematic with the intensity of the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Instances claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the water all through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately from the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as readers sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second inside the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes over and above what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has long been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and ailments connected to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing link to the area as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair just endeavoring to make a family property in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Particular Space of Conservation and say that all operates are carried out based upon professional suggestions and approved options. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including coming into The ocean for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to community advocacy on setting up and environmental problems, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-high drinking water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result stays uncertain. The court need to decide whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to Dwell alongside one another extended after the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles such as environmental defense and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. Regardless of whether it will eventually ultimately be altered, eliminated, or concluded as prepared will count on the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely continue on to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to Probably the most closely watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.